Sambit Patra hardens stand in Orissa HC over Bagala Dharmasala land sale

By Express News Service

CUTTACK:  The authorized battle over sale of plots from Bagala Dharmasala land in Puri intensified in the Orissa High Court right here on Monday with BJP chief and celebration nationwide spokesperson Sambit Patra pinpointing his allegations in reference to the dispute raised by him earlier in a PIL.

In a rejoinder to the State authorities’s counter affidavit, Patra alleged that the State authorities had illegally offered Amrutamanohi properties of Lord Jagannath “in the garb of rehabilitation and resettlement” of some individuals displaced below the heritage undertaking in Puri.

Patra mentioned his PIL is in no means meant to come back in between the event of Puri city. It is meant for defense of the land in query of Lord Jagannath Mahaprabhu, Puri below Amrutamanohi standing, which the State our bodies are alienating in the garb of improvement, he mentioned.

In the federal government’s affidavit, it was claimed that “the land was acquired by the government in 1901 and by virtue of it the land lost its status of Amrutamanohi and the right, title, interest of the recorded owner Shree Jagannath Mahaprabhu marfat Bhagaban Ramanuj Das, over the land stood extinguished and the land became a government land.”

By the time the Shree Jagannath Temple Act, 1955 got here into drive, the land was already authorities land in view of the acquisition by the federal government and it was no extra an endowment land of Shree Jagannath Mahaprabhu. Hence the provisions of Section 5 and 33 of the Jagannath Temple Act, 1955 are usually not relevant to the land, the federal government had claimed.

Appearing on behalf of Patra, senior advocate Pitambar Acharya submitted earlier than the Court that the federal government had no energy to execute the sale deeds because the land doesn’t belong to the State. The Amrutamanohi property of Lord Shree Jagannath Mahaprabhu was illegally recorded in the title of Lodging House Fund Committee, Puri headed by the Collector.

Taking be aware of the rejoinder, the division bench of Chief Justice S Muralidhar and Justice BP Routray fastened August 9 for listening to on the matter.  In his petition, Patra has sought quashing of alienation of property of Lord Jagannath Mahaprabhu and subsequent sale of land from it to 6 individuals.

The sale of the land was unlawful because the Shree Jagannath Temple Act, 1955 prohibited switch or sale of Amrutamanohi lands. The Amrutamanohi properties in very nature of it are meant for the benefaction of pilgrims, beggars and ascetics. It shouldn’t be meant for the aim for settlement or distribution below a rehabilitation and resettlement package deal, he mentioned.

Source link

Related Articles

Back to top button