The Supreme Court has registered a suo motu contempt case against journalist Rajdeep Sardesai for his tweets allegedly scandalising the judiciary.
Photograph: Surinder Nagar.
The case was registered following a petition filed by one Aastha Khurana by way of advocate Om Prakash Parihar underneath Article 129 of the Constitution to the Chief Justice of India for initiating contempt proceedings against Sardesai.
On September 17, 2020, Attorney General Okay Okay Venugopal had declined his consent to provoke contempt motion against Sardesai.
“That the present contempt petition under Article 129 of the Constitution of India is being filed by the petitioner against the alleged contemnor/respondent for wilful disobedient comments passed on each and every decision/judgment passed by this court which leads to cause disrespect to the superior court of India in the minds of citizens of India”, the plea stated.
Article 129,of the Constitution states that the Supreme Court shall be a court docket of report and shall have all of the powers of such a court docket together with the ability to punish for contempt of itself.
The plea stated that the highest court docket up to now has handed varied landmark judgments and on every judgment, the alleged contemnor has handed varied disrespectful feedback and questioned the equity and credibility of the court docket.
It referred to a tweet by Sardesai on August 31, 2020, in respect to the highest court docket verdict imposing a high-quality of Re 1 on advocate Prashant Bhushan for contempt of court docket.