The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) on Wednesday urged the Bombay excessive courtroom to dismiss actor Sonu Sood’s petition looking for to restrain the civic physique from finishing up demolition at his property in Mumbai.
Sood suppressed the information that demolition had been carried out on the constructing for unlawful development earlier too and he had no licence to run a lodge there, the BMC stated.
The actor moved the HC after the Dindoshi City Civil Court refused to restrain the civic physique from taking motion in opposition to alleged unauthorised alterations on the constructing which stands in Juhu space.
Sood transformed six flooring of the residential constructing right into a lodge with out permission, the BMC has alleged.
Arguing earlier than Justice P Ok Chavan, BMC lawyer and senior advocate Anil Sakhare stated the demolition discover was issued in October 2020 after it got here to gentle that he had made a number of alterations in breach of the sanctioned plans.
The actor constructed 24 lodge rooms on six flooring, numbered them, and company have been discovered to be staying in these rooms, Sakhare stated.
Advocate Amogh Singh, Sood’s lawyer, contended that he carried out solely beautification work for which the BMC’s permission was not wanted.
Sood had utilized for a change of person of the property in October however the utility was pending, he stated.
But the BMC lawyer identified that he had not submitted any proof of such an utility.
Parts of the property had been demolished by the BMC in November 2018 and once more in February 2020 for unauthorised development, Sakhare stated.
“He retains restoring demolished parts each time with out permission. He has no technical permission or a licence to use the property as a lodge.
“Yet, he suppresses these facts in his appeal….the appellant has not come with clean hands,” Sakhare stated, demanding that the plea be dismissed.
The actor’s lawyer additionally instructed the courtroom that he had mortgaged the property with a non-public financial institution and was utilizing the funds for ‘social causes’.
Last 12 months, Sood had earned reward for serving to migrant labourers who have been returning to their native states after lockdown was enforced for coronavirus.
Justice Chavan, nevertheless, stated this level was not related.
The courtroom stated it was reserving its ruling which can be pronounced quickly.